Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via BTC Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
Market context
Coleman Wong and Anton Shepp were scheduled to face off in the Lincoln ATP Challenger on 15 July 2026, but the match has already concluded with Wong advancing, cementing the 100% YES crowd-implied probability for his victory. The result settled the on-chain contract early, with USDC payouts now locked for holders of the “Coleman Wong” position, reflecting a clean resolution before the 2026-07-22 settlement window. This outcome mirrors prior ATP Challenger matches where one-sided H2H records or recent form led to near-total market certainty, such as Wong’s 4/5 loss in a previous Huling Laban encounter that nonetheless did not prevent his progression in high-stakes qualifiers [1].
Traders should monitor the ATP’s official schedule for any rescheduling dependencies or player retirements that could trigger the 50-50 clause if a match begins but is not completed due to opponent withdrawal. While this specific contract has resolved, similar Lincoln Challenger markets remain sensitive to funding rate shifts in BTC and ETH, as whale flows often precede major sports settlement events on crypto prediction platforms. Recent volatility in spot prices on exchanges like Coinbase and Binance has correlated with increased volume in sports prediction markets, suggesting macro crypto conditions may influence liquidity in upcoming tennis contracts [2]. With Wong’s advancement confirmed, the market’s resolution is final, and no further catalysts will alter the outcome.
Methodology
Methodologically this overview focuses on on-chain pricing: Polymarket's live mid comes from the Polygon conditional-token order book and settles automatically in USDC. The other three venues — Kalshi, Betfair, Manifold — sit alongside as off-chain reference points so you can see how the contract translates across regulatory and settlement regimes.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.
Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.
FAQ
- Why USDC and not ETH or USDT?
- USDC is the Polygon standard — audited reserves (Circle, monthly attestation), deepest order book, low gas costs. ETH volatility would distort probability quotes; USDT has thinner Polygon liquidity than USDC.
- What does a transaction cost on Polygon?
- Polygon gas is typically under $0.01 per transaction. A full trade cycle (Approve + Order + Fill) totals around $0.03 — compared to $5-50 on Ethereum mainnet.
- How does UMA secure the resolution?
- The UMA Optimistic Oracle uses a bond system: a proposer posts a bond, a two-hour challenge window opens. On dispute the losing side forfeits the bond — financial incentive for honest resolution.
- Which crypto markets exist on Polymarket?
- Currently active markets include BTC/ETH/SOL price targets, halving dates, ETF approvals, hard-fork outcomes and Layer-2 TVL thresholds. The list updates weekly; biggest volume sits on BTC and ETH price forecasts.
- Are crypto prediction markets taxable in the US?
- In the US, prediction market gains are typically treated as ordinary income or short-term capital gains depending on holding period. Consult a tax professional for your specific situation — we cannot provide tax advice.
Trade Lincoln: Coleman Wong vs Anton Shepp on BTC Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →