Roland Garros ATP: Stan Wawrinka vs Arthur Fils

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Stan Wawrinka is due to meet Arthur Fils in the first round at Roland Garros, with the market currently pricing a Fils advance at about 86% and Wawrinka at 14%. That sits broadly in line with bookmaker pricing: Oddschecker shows Fils heavily favoured on the match, while other previews have Fils near 1.22 to win the first set, implying a strong expectation that the younger French player starts fast on clay. Kalshi’s exact-score market also leans towards a straight-sets Fils win, which matches the crowd’s low view of Wawrinka’s chances.

The main reference point is age and surface form rather than name value. Wawrinka remains a dangerous clay-court shot-maker, but he is well into the back end of his career and would likely need Fils to be below par to turn this into a contest. Fils, by contrast, is the higher-ranked, more explosive player and has home-crowd support in Paris. If the match is completed as scheduled, the market should mostly track whether Fils holds serve cleanly early; a slow start would be the clearest path for the 14% side to look underpriced.

For settlement, the key dependencies are straightforward: the match must be played and a winner must advance before the seven-day delay threshold. If the fixture is postponed beyond that window, or if it is cancelled or left unresolved, the market flips to 50-50 under the contract rules. Traders should watch Roland Garros order-of-play updates and any late fitness or scheduling news, because clay events can be affected by weather and court backlog as much as by player injury.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically this overview focuses on on-chain pricing: Polymarket's live mid comes from the Polygon conditional-token order book and settles automatically in USDC. The other three venues — Kalshi, Betfair, Manifold — are listed with their platform attributes, because they operate off-chain and a 1:1 comparison of contract mechanics isn't possible.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.