Poznan: Dalibor Svrcina vs Gustavo Heide

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Dalibor Svrcina and Gustavo Heide have already played their Poznań semi-final, and the ATP live score page shows Heide won 2-6, 7-5, 6-2.[3] That matters for this market because the contract settles on who advances, not on pre-match pricing; with the winner known, a 0% implied YES looks consistent with a completed result rather than with a live uncertainty trade.[3]

Historically, these tennis advance-or-not markets tend to swing sharply when the bracket is settled, because the settlement is binary and tied to official progression rather than set scoreline. Flashscore listed the matchup as a Challenger men’s singles semi-final on clay, with Svrcina then ranked ATP 110 and Heide ATP 187, which explains why the market may have attracted interest before play began, but not after an official three-set result is posted.[2] The Poznań Open’s own social post also confirmed Heide’s win, matching the ATP score feed.[8]

For traders watching the remaining settlement window, the key catalyst is not another tennis announcement but whether the market administrator treats the result as final or reclassifies it under the contract’s delayed-or-unplayed clause. The market description says cancellation, a tie, or a delay beyond seven days without a winner would force a 50-50 outcome, so the only live risk would be a rules dispute or data mismatch, not on-court action. Because the position settles in USDC on-chain, any late adjustment would be mechanical rather than discretionary, with the market outcome driven by the official advancement record rather than by BTC or ETH price moves.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reads Poznan: Dalibor Svrcina vs Gustavo Heide on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed for comparison. Every CTA routes to BTC Prediction, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On BTC Prediction, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

BTC Prediction is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on BTC Prediction?

Zero. BTC Prediction routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.