Bengaluru 3: Ilya Ivashka vs Hamish Stewart

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Ilya Ivashka and Hamish Stewart were due to meet in the Bengaluru 3 Challenger on 22 May, with live match data showing Ivashka ahead 6-3, 0-1 and serving at 15-30 in the second set. In a market already priced at 100% YES for Ivashka, the near-certain reading is driven by the contract structure as much as the scoreline: once play begins, a completed result or an on-court advance normally settles the market outright, while only cancellation, a tie, or a delay beyond seven days pushes it to 50-50. On-chain, that means the key question is not pre-match opinion but whether the exchange reaches a clean USDC-settled outcome before the window closes.

Comparable tennis markets on prediction venues tend to be sharpest when a match is underway and one player is in control, because traders treat live score feeds as the main settlement input. Here, that matters more than ranking or name recognition: Ivashka’s live lead is the dominant fact, and the odds of a reversed outcome would typically need a retire­ment, walkover, or scorekeeping issue to reprice meaningfully. If the contract is trading on a crypto venue, the final price can also reflect broader market conditions around BTC and ETH only indirectly, through liquidity and risk appetite rather than the tennis result itself.

What to watch is whether the match is officially completed and how the tournament updates the order of play and result feed. If the score is final on ATP or major live-score services, the market should settle in line with the winner; if there is a retirement after the match starts, the advance rule in the market description becomes decisive. Any tournament suspension, abandoned session, or administrative delay that prevents a winner being recorded before the seven-day cutoff would be the main path to a 50-50 resolution.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reads Bengaluru 3: Ilya Ivashka vs Hamish Stewart on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed for comparison. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.