Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Vilius Gaubas vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Vilius Gaubas and Pablo Llamas Ruiz are due to meet in Roland Garros qualifying, with the market set to resolve on who advances. The current 0% YES reading suggests the contract is either mispriced or the crowd is treating the outcome as effectively settled in Pablo Llamas Ruiz’s favour. That fits the narrow historical picture available: the pair have met once in professional competition, with Pablo Llamas Ruiz leading the head-to-head 1-0, and a betting preview published for this match put his win probability at around 65%. Recent form signals are mixed rather than one-sided, with ESPN listing Pablo Llamas Ruiz at 2-1 in 2026 singles so far, while other match pages cited him as 3-3 across his last six.

For traders, the main catalyst is simply whether the qualifying draw and court schedule hold, because any delay beyond seven days from the planned date would push the contract to a 50-50 outcome rather than a standard winner settlement. If the match is played, the key information is the official result from Roland Garros and any withdrawal notice before first serve; once a match starts, a retirement or abandonment changes the settlement path. In crypto terms, the market is USDC-settled, so pricing can also be affected by broader risk appetite in BTC and ETH, but there is no obvious on-chain event tied directly to this tennis contract unless wider market moves alter liquidity or the depth of the order book before the result is known.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reads Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Vilius Gaubas vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed for comparison. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.