Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Nerman Fatic vs Kyrian Jacquet

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Nerman Fatic and Kyrian Jacquet were due to meet in Roland Garros qualifying, with the market still set at 0% YES despite the fixture appearing on live scoreboards and betting feeds. That makes the contract unusually sensitive to whether the match is actually completed, rather than to the pre-match edge alone. In comparable tennis markets, a 50-50 outcome only comes into play if play is abandoned, the match is not completed, or the event slips beyond the seven-day settlement window; otherwise the winner of the on-court match determines resolution. On-chain, that means USDC holders are effectively pricing not just player strength but event execution risk.

Fatic had already progressed through qualifying, while Jacquet’s recent results and clay record matter more than broader ATP rank snapshots. Clay is the key surface here: Fatic’s record shown in live stats is heavily clay-based, whereas Jacquet has a larger proportion of hard-court matches, which can affect how the match is read on form alone. The practical catalysts are straightforward: official tournament order-of-play updates, any weather-related suspensions in Paris, and whether the match is resumed or finished inside the settlement window. If the pair start and one player is later awarded the win, the market resolves normally; if play never gets under way or cannot be completed in time, the tie outcome becomes relevant. Real-time price discovery in surrounding crypto markets is unlikely to alter settlement, but wider BTC or ETH volatility can still influence risk appetite and liquidity on USDC-settled books.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reads Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Nerman Fatic vs Kyrian Jacquet on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed for comparison. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.