Geneva Open: Edas Butvilas vs Alexander Bublik

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Edas Butvilas is due to play Alexander Bublik in the Geneva Open round of 16. The crowd has priced the market at 0% YES, which is well below the wider tennis pricing seen elsewhere: bookmakers and tennis preview sites have had Bublik as a clear favourite, with implied win chances in the mid-70s to low-80s and Butvilas listed as a sizeable outsider. That gap matters for a binary prediction contract, because even a small scheduling or retirement edge can move a market that is otherwise one-sided before first serve.

Comparable ATP match markets usually stay near the favourite until team sheets, walkovers, or injury news create a clear path to a 50-50 settlement. Here the key historical framing is that Bublik has the stronger ranking and market support, but clay has narrowed some profile gaps in past Geneva-type matchups, and any delay beyond seven days from the original date would force a 50-50 resolution under the contract terms. If the match starts but is not completed, settlement still hinges on who advances, so live retirement mechanics are more important than pre-match narratives.

Traders should watch the ATP live scores page, tournament scheduling updates, and any late withdrawals from Geneva, because the market resolves on the official advancement outcome rather than bookmaker intent. On-chain, the contract settles in USDC, so broader BTC and ETH moves only matter insofar as they affect platform liquidity and funding for positions; they do not change the tennis outcome. If the match remains unscheduled or is pushed outside the seven-day window, the fallback resolution becomes the main risk, not form or ranking.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reads Geneva Open: Edas Butvilas vs Alexander Bublik on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed for comparison. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.