Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via BTC Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi | 0% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set 2 Winner | 0% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Dan Added is playing Kenta Miyoshi in the Samsun Challenger on outdoor hard courts, with live listings placing the match on 30 July and both players already drawn into the same round of 16 slot. Added is the higher-ranked player, around ATP No. 224, while Miyoshi is around ATP No. 602, so the market’s 0% YES price implies traders are effectively treating an Added advance as very unlikely despite the ranking gap.[1][6]
That near-zero read is best compared with how on-chain markets price obvious schedule and status risk rather than pure tennis skill. If a match is already underway or has a visible live score feed, the settlement question shifts from pre-match winner odds to whether the outcome is actually recorded cleanly before the contract window closes; prediction markets on USDC tend to reprice sharply once an official result, retirement, or abandonment path becomes clearer. In this case, the listed live score sources show the contest in progress and even an evolving set score, which means the main risk is no longer whether the fixture exists, but whether it finishes in a way that produces a definitive advancing player before the 7-day fallback applies.[2][5]
The key catalysts are the official match status, any retirement or walkover announcement, and whether the tournament schedule holds steady enough for the result to be posted by the settlement deadline. Live tennis data services already disagree on exact start times, which is common in Challenger coverage and is a reminder that traders should watch the event feed rather than a single schedule line; if the match is suspended, delayed, or not completed, the contract’s 50-50 fallback becomes relevant. For broader crypto context, the price action will usually be driven more by the market’s interpretation of the event feed than by BTC or ETH direction, unless a wider risk-off move changes USDC liquidity conditions around the market maker’s books.[1][2][4]
Methodology
Methodologically this overview focuses on on-chain pricing: Polymarket's live mid comes from the Polygon conditional-token order book and settles automatically in USDC. The other three venues — Kalshi, Betfair, Manifold — sit alongside as off-chain reference points so you can see how the contract translates across regulatory and settlement regimes.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.
Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.
FAQ
- What are crypto prediction markets?
- Crypto prediction markets are on-chain smart contracts where you buy YES or NO shares on a future crypto event (e.g. "BTC above $100k by year-end"). The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- Why USDC and not ETH or USDT?
- USDC is the Polygon standard — audited reserves (Circle, monthly attestation), deepest order book, low gas costs. ETH volatility would distort probability quotes; USDT has thinner Polygon liquidity than USDC.
- How does UMA secure the resolution?
- The UMA Optimistic Oracle uses a bond system: a proposer posts a bond, a two-hour challenge window opens. On dispute the losing side forfeits the bond — financial incentive for honest resolution.
- Which crypto markets exist on Polymarket?
- Currently active markets include BTC/ETH/SOL price targets, halving dates, ETF approvals, hard-fork outcomes and Layer-2 TVL thresholds. The list updates weekly; biggest volume sits on BTC and ETH price forecasts.
- Are crypto prediction markets taxable in the US?
- In the US, prediction market gains are typically treated as ordinary income or short-term capital gains depending on holding period. Consult a tax professional for your specific situation — we cannot provide tax advice.
Trade Samsun: Dan Added vs Kenta Miyoshi on BTC Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →