Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via BTC Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
56% | 44% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
56% | 44% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 56% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 56% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 52% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 51% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 50% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 45% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1? | 43% |
| Game Handicap: NS (-1.5) vs HANJIN BRION (+1.5) | 42% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2? | 42% |
| Game 2 Winner | 38% |
| Game 1 Winner | 37% |
| Match Winner | 31% |
Market context
HANJIN BRION and Nongshim Red Force are scheduled to meet in an LCK Round 3-4 Rise Group best-of-three, with the market sitting at a 38% implied chance for HANJIN BRION. That pricing broadly reflects a modest underdog position for BRION against a side ranked higher in recent tournament listings, while still leaving room for a series upset in a format where two map wins decide the contract. Nongshim are listed ahead of BRION in world ranking on match pages, and recent head-to-head data has leaned their way overall, which helps explain why the crowd is not pricing BRION as a clear favourite.[2][10][11]
Comparable LCK meetings suggest the market can move quickly on roster strength and prior form rather than on single-map variance alone. Nongshim’s lineup has been described in recent coverage as including established names such as Scout and Lehends, and one preview notes that recent wins have steadied their record after earlier round struggles, while other match histories show BRION have been capable of taking a series when the draft and early game line up.[8][14] Because this contract settles in USDC, on-chain positioning can also matter at the margin: traders often react to broader crypto risk sentiment, but the payoff here still depends first on the live esports result rather than BTC or ETH direction.
The main catalysts are straightforward: whether the match starts on time, whether both teams field the expected roster, and whether the series is completed within the settlement window. GosuGamers and other schedules place the series for 05 Aug 2026 at 08:00 UTC, which is consistent with the market’s 4:00AM ET framing, so any broadcast delay, postponement, or format change would be the key operational risk for resolution.[2][5] If the match is not played, ends without a winner, or is delayed beyond seven days from the scheduled date, the market resolves 50-50 under the contract rules.
Methodology
Methodologically this overview focuses on on-chain pricing: Polymarket's live mid comes from the Polygon conditional-token order book and settles automatically in USDC. The other three venues — Kalshi, Betfair, Manifold — sit alongside as off-chain reference points so you can see how the contract translates across regulatory and settlement regimes.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.
Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.
FAQ
- What are crypto prediction markets?
- Crypto prediction markets are on-chain smart contracts where you buy YES or NO shares on a future crypto event (e.g. "BTC above $100k by year-end"). The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- Why USDC and not ETH or USDT?
- USDC is the Polygon standard — audited reserves (Circle, monthly attestation), deepest order book, low gas costs. ETH volatility would distort probability quotes; USDT has thinner Polygon liquidity than USDC.
- What does a transaction cost on Polygon?
- Polygon gas is typically under $0.01 per transaction. A full trade cycle (Approve + Order + Fill) totals around $0.03 — compared to $5-50 on Ethereum mainnet.
- How does UMA secure the resolution?
- The UMA Optimistic Oracle uses a bond system: a proposer posts a bond, a two-hour challenge window opens. On dispute the losing side forfeits the bond — financial incentive for honest resolution.
- Are crypto prediction markets taxable in the US?
- In the US, prediction market gains are typically treated as ordinary income or short-term capital gains depending on holding period. Consult a tax professional for your specific situation — we cannot provide tax advice.
Trade LoL: HANJIN BRION vs Nongshim Red Force (BO3) - LCK … on BTC Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →