Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via BTC Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
97% | 3% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
97% | 3% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Harry Kane: 1+ shots | 97% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ shots | 91% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ shots | 85% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ shots | 82% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ shots | 72% |
| Santiago Giménez: 2+ shots | 66% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ shots | 61% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ shots | 61% |
| Harry Kane: 4+ shots | 60% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ shots | 56% |
| Santiago Giménez: 1+ shots | 55% |
| Armando González: 1+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 2+ shots | 49% |
| Ollie Watkins: 2+ shots | 49% |
| Armando González: 2+ shots | 48% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Ivan Toney: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Ollie Watkins: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Santiago Giménez: 1+ shots on target | 48% |
| Jordan Pickford: 2+ saves | 48% |
| Raúl Rangel: 2+ saves | 48% |
| Raúl Rangel: 4+ saves | 48% |
| Raúl Rangel: 5+ saves | 48% |
| Ollie Watkins: 1+ shots | 47% |
| Raúl Rangel: 3+ saves | 47% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ shots | 46% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ shots | 41% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ goals + assists | 41% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ goals + assists | 39% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ goals | 38% |
| Ivan Toney: 1+ shots | 38% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ goals + assists | 38% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ shots on target | 37% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ shots on target | 36% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ shots on target | 35% |
| Ollie Watkins: 2+ shots on target | 34% |
| Jordan Pickford: 3+ saves | 34% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ goals + assists | 34% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ shots | 33% |
| Armando González: 2+ shots on target | 33% |
| Ivan Toney: 2+ shots on target | 33% |
| Julián Quiñones: 4+ goals + assists | 33% |
| Ollie Watkins: 4+ shots | 32% |
| Santiago Giménez: 4+ shots | 32% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ shots on target | 32% |
| Santiago Giménez: 2+ shots on target | 32% |
| Jordan Pickford: 4+ saves | 32% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ goals + assists | 32% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ goals + assists | 31% |
| Marcus Rashford: 4+ goals + assists | 31% |
| Ivan Toney: 3+ shots on target | 30% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ shots on target | 30% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ shots on target | 30% |
| Jordan Pickford: 5+ saves | 30% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ goals + assists | 30% |
| Harry Kane: 4+ shots on target | 29% |
| Armando González: 5+ shots | 28% |
| Ivan Toney: 4+ shots on target | 28% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ shots on target | 28% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ goals + assists | 28% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ goals | 27% |
| Armando González: 1+ shots | 27% |
| Santiago Giménez: 5+ shots | 27% |
| Armando González: 4+ shots | 26% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ shots | 26% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ goals | 25% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 4+ shots | 24% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 4+ goals + assists | 22% |
| Harry Kane: 4+ goals + assists | 21% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ goals + assists | 21% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ goals + assists | 21% |
| Julián Quiñones: 4+ shots | 20% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ shots on target | 16% |
| Marcus Rashford: 4+ shots | 15% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ shots on target | 15% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ shots on target | 14% |
| Harry Kane: 5+ shots | 13% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ assists | 13% |
| Armando González: 1+ goals | 12% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ goals | 12% |
| Marcus Rashford: 5+ shots | 12% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ assists | 12% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 5+ shots | 11% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ assists | 11% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ assists | 10% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ goals | 9% |
| Julián Quiñones: 5+ shots | 8% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ goals + assists | 8% |
| Santiago Giménez: 1+ goals | 7% |
| Ollie Watkins: 4+ shots on target | 7% |
| Ollie Watkins: 1+ goals | 6% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ goals | 6% |
| Ivan Toney: 1+ goals | 5% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ goals | 4% |
| Armando González: 3+ shots | 4% |
| Ivan Toney: 3+ shots | 4% |
| Ollie Watkins: 3+ shots | 4% |
| Santiago Giménez: 3+ shots | 4% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ goals + assists | 4% |
| Ollie Watkins: 2+ goals | 3% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ assists | 3% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ assists | 3% |
| Armando González: 3+ goals | 2% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ goals | 2% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ goals | 2% |
| Ollie Watkins: 3+ goals | 2% |
| Santiago Giménez: 2+ goals | 2% |
| Santiago Giménez: 3+ goals | 2% |
| Ivan Toney: 5+ shots | 2% |
| Ollie Watkins: 5+ shots | 2% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ assists | 2% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ assists | 2% |
| Armando González: 3+ shots on target | 2% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ shots on target | 2% |
| Ollie Watkins: 3+ shots on target | 2% |
| Santiago Giménez: 3+ shots on target | 2% |
| Armando González: 2+ goals | 1% |
| Ivan Toney: 2+ goals | 1% |
| Ivan Toney: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Ivan Toney: 4+ shots | 1% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ goals | 0% |
Market context
The FIFA World Cup Round of 16 clash between Mexico and England kicks off at 8:00 PM ET today at Estadio Banorte in Mexico City, with the crowd-implied probability for the "Mexico vs. England – Player Props" market sitting at a tight 12% YES. Historical precedents for World Cup knockout games in high-altitude venues like the Azteca often favour the home side or produce tight, low-scoring affairs, yet England’s superior tournament experience and Harry Kane’s prolific shooting record—having exceeded 2.5 shots in five consecutive games—complicate this narrative[1][2]. While past matches in similar conditions have frequently ended in draws or narrow 1-0 victories, the current 12% probability suggests the market is pricing in a specific player outcome that may be an outlier compared to the broader trend of cautious, defensive knockout football[6].
Traders should monitor the official lineups released before kickoff, as any late injury to Kane or Mexico’s key attackers could drastically alter the player prop settlement, alongside the live betting odds which currently list England as -136 favourites to advance[4][8]. The settlement window closes on 6 July 2026, and the contract’s on-chain mechanics utilise USDC for settlement, tying the outcome to the broader BTC/ETH macro environment where whale flows into sports prediction markets often surge during high-profile World Cup matches[1]. Recent exchange spot data indicates funding rates for sports-related derivatives are elevated, suggesting significant institutional interest in this specific player prop, while the over/under line for total goals is set at 2.5, a figure many analysts deem a strong value bet given both teams’ attacking quality[2][9].
Methodology
This page reads Mexico vs. England - Player Props on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed alongside for venue context. Every CTA routes to BTC Prediction, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.
Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.
FAQ
- What are crypto prediction markets?
- Crypto prediction markets are on-chain smart contracts where you buy YES or NO shares on a future crypto event (e.g. "BTC above $100k by year-end"). The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- Why USDC and not ETH or USDT?
- USDC is the Polygon standard — audited reserves (Circle, monthly attestation), deepest order book, low gas costs. ETH volatility would distort probability quotes; USDT has thinner Polygon liquidity than USDC.
- Can I use Bitcoin directly?
- No, Polymarket operates exclusively in USDC on Polygon. You can bridge BTC to USDC via an exchange or bridge service and deposit on Polygon — typically 10-30 minutes processing time.
- How volatile are crypto prediction markets?
- Crypto markets react to spot prices — a 5% BTC move typically shifts a "BTC above X by date" market 10-20%. Polymarket crypto market liquidity is usually six-figure USD, sufficient for active trading.
- Are crypto prediction markets taxable in the US?
- In the US, prediction market gains are typically treated as ordinary income or short-term capital gains depending on holding period. Consult a tax professional for your specific situation — we cannot provide tax advice.
Trade Mexico vs. England - Player Props on BTC Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →