Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via BTC Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Match O/U 21.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Match O/U 22.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu Match O/U 23.5 | 0% |
Market context
Kenta Miyoshi’s match with Vadym Ursu in Samsun is the live event behind the market, and the current 100% crowd-implied price leaves almost no room for uncertainty even though the contract still depends on the official result. Public tennis listings show the quarter-final status, with Miyoshi the lower-ranked player at ATP 602 against Ursu at ATP 416, but live scoreboards also indicate the contest was already underway on 31 July, which matters because an in-play retirement still settles to the player who advances rather than to a void.[2][5][6][8]
The historical frame is thin because there is no recorded head-to-head at the professional level, so traders are leaning more on recent form and market structure than on direct matchup evidence.[4] External preview sites have shown Miyoshi on a strong run, while aggregate stats suggest his 2026 hard-court results have been respectable enough to support a one-sided market, but that is not the same as a completed win.[1][3][11] In an on-chain market settled in USDC, a 100% YES quote mainly reflects consensus, not finality, so the practical risk is less about competitive balance and more about whether the match reaches an official conclusion before the settlement window closes.
The key catalysts are schedule integrity, scoreboard updates, and any retirement or walkover call from the tournament referee, because those determine whether the market resolves to Miyoshi, Ursu, or a 50-50 void if the match is never properly completed. The listed start times vary slightly across tennis data feeds, which is normal for challenger events and can flag timing uncertainty rather than a change in outcome.[5][6][12] For crypto-linked traders, the relevant market microstructure point is that the contract is isolated from BTC and ETH price direction unless wider risk sentiment affects liquidity or whale positioning elsewhere; if nothing on the court forces a reschedule or retirement, the current 100% YES price is mostly a reflection of that near-term settlement clarity.
Methodology
This page reads Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed alongside for venue context. Every CTA routes to BTC Prediction, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.
Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.
FAQ
- Why USDC and not ETH or USDT?
- USDC is the Polygon standard — audited reserves (Circle, monthly attestation), deepest order book, low gas costs. ETH volatility would distort probability quotes; USDT has thinner Polygon liquidity than USDC.
- Can I use Bitcoin directly?
- No, Polymarket operates exclusively in USDC on Polygon. You can bridge BTC to USDC via an exchange or bridge service and deposit on Polygon — typically 10-30 minutes processing time.
- How does UMA secure the resolution?
- The UMA Optimistic Oracle uses a bond system: a proposer posts a bond, a two-hour challenge window opens. On dispute the losing side forfeits the bond — financial incentive for honest resolution.
- How volatile are crypto prediction markets?
- Crypto markets react to spot prices — a 5% BTC move typically shifts a "BTC above X by date" market 10-20%. Polymarket crypto market liquidity is usually six-figure USD, sufficient for active trading.
- Which crypto markets exist on Polymarket?
- Currently active markets include BTC/ETH/SOL price targets, halving dates, ETF approvals, hard-fork outcomes and Layer-2 TVL thresholds. The list updates weekly; biggest volume sits on BTC and ETH price forecasts.
Trade Samsun: Kenta Miyoshi vs Vadym Ursu on BTC Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →