Al Ittihad Saudi Club vs. Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Al Ittihad host Al Qadsiyah in the Saudi Pro League, with the market still showing 0% YES even though the fixture is scheduled for later today and therefore cannot be treated as a settled no. That kind of pricing is usually a mechanics issue rather than a football view: on-chain event markets often show a zero until the contract is populated, indexed, or the first meaningful liquidity arrives. On the pitch, this is a live top-of-table calibre meeting rather than a mismatch. Sofascore has Al Qadsiyah fourth and Al Ittihad fifth, while historical head-to-head data from AiScore shows Al Ittihad have the stronger record overall, winning 17 of 29 meetings since 2005, with nine draws and three Al Qadsiyah wins.

Recent comparable results suggest the market should be read as highly sensitive to line-up and venue effects rather than a simple favourite/underdog call. ESPN records Al Ittihad’s 3-1 win over Al Qadsiyah in May 2025, while FotMob notes Al Qadsiyah beat Al Ittihad 2-1 in a more recent league meeting, which underlines that the fixture has not been one-way in the short run. For a crypto-linked market, the relevant dependency is settlement integrity: if the event resolves against the 18:00 UTC window, USDC payout timing and oracle confirmation become the key trade mechanics, not the football narrative. Traders watching around the close should focus on confirmed kick-off status, line-up announcements, and any late suspension or postponement news.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reads Al Ittihad Saudi Club vs. Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed for comparison. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.