Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via BTC Prediction) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open live market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open live market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open live market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open live market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open live market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | 100% |
| Match Winner | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-2.5) vs MIBR LOS (+2.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs MIBR LOS (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-4.5) vs MIBR LOS (+4.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-5.5) vs MIBR LOS (+5.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-6.5) vs MIBR LOS (+6.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-9.5) vs MIBR LOS (+9.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-8.5) vs MIBR LOS (+8.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-7.5) vs MIBR LOS (+7.5) | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-3.5) vs MIBR LOS (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-5.5) vs MIBR LOS (+5.5) | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-4.5) vs MIBR LOS (+4.5) | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 97% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | 93% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: MIBR LOS (-2.5) vs 100 Thieves (+2.5) | 90% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | 90% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-2.5) vs MIBR LOS (+2.5) | 90% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 19.5 | 90% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 17.5 | 90% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 16.5 | 90% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 15.5 | 90% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.5 | 50% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-7.5) vs MIBR LOS (+7.5) | 50% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-6.5) vs MIBR LOS (+6.5) | 50% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-8.5) vs MIBR LOS (+8.5) | 50% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: MIBR LOS (-2.5) vs 100 Thieves (+2.5) | 10% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | 10% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | 10% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-2.5) vs MIBR LOS (+2.5) | 10% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: MIBR LOS (-3.5) vs 100 Thieves (+3.5) | 10% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: MIBR LOS (-4.5) vs 100 Thieves (+4.5) | 10% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 25.5 | 10% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 23.5 | 10% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 10% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 19.5 | 10% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 23.5 | 10% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 1% |
| Map 2 Winner | 0% |
| Map Handicap: MIBR LOS (-1.5) vs 100 Thieves (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: MIBR LOS (-2.5) vs 100 Thieves (+2.5) | 0% |
| Map Handicap: 100T (-1.5) vs MIBR LOS (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 19.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 16.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 17.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 15.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: 100 Thieves (-11.5) vs MIBR LOS (+11.5) | 0% |
Market context
100 Thieves face MIBR.LOS in the Esports World Cup 2026 Quarterfinal 4, a Best-of-3 clash scheduled for 9:45 AM ET on 10 July. The market currently implies a 100% probability of a 100 Thieves win, reflecting their dominant 2–0 victory over MIBR in the VCT 2026 Americas Stage 1 earlier this year, where MIBR fielded aspas alongside ranked acquaintances rather than a full professional roster [1][10]. Historical precedence in this matchup suggests a steep asymmetry; similar one-sided BO3 results in regional qualifiers have consistently resolved to the higher-ranked side without requiring late-stage settlement adjustments, reinforcing the crowd’s certainty that a cancellation or tie scenario is negligible.
Traders should monitor the live score feed on GosuGamers and the official EWC bracket on Liquipedia for any delay beyond the seven-day resolution window, which would trigger a 50–50 settlement [2][8]. The match’s USDC settlement ties directly to on-chain execution: if the game begins but is interrupted, the contract resolves to the winner declared by the official match operator, mirroring how BTC perpetual funding rates adjust to spot dislocations during liquidity gaps. Recent whale flows into esports prediction contracts suggest capital is positioning for a clean resolution, with no material news indicating roster instability or schedule changes that would alter the outcome [6].
Methodology
Methodologically this overview focuses on on-chain pricing: Polymarket's live mid comes from the Polygon conditional-token order book and settles automatically in USDC. The other three venues — Kalshi, Betfair, Manifold — sit alongside as off-chain reference points so you can see how the contract translates across regulatory and settlement regimes.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.
Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.
FAQ
- What are crypto prediction markets?
- Crypto prediction markets are on-chain smart contracts where you buy YES or NO shares on a future crypto event (e.g. "BTC above $100k by year-end"). The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- Why USDC and not ETH or USDT?
- USDC is the Polygon standard — audited reserves (Circle, monthly attestation), deepest order book, low gas costs. ETH volatility would distort probability quotes; USDT has thinner Polygon liquidity than USDC.
- How does UMA secure the resolution?
- The UMA Optimistic Oracle uses a bond system: a proposer posts a bond, a two-hour challenge window opens. On dispute the losing side forfeits the bond — financial incentive for honest resolution.
- How volatile are crypto prediction markets?
- Crypto markets react to spot prices — a 5% BTC move typically shifts a "BTC above X by date" market 10-20%. Polymarket crypto market liquidity is usually six-figure USD, sufficient for active trading.
- Are crypto prediction markets taxable in the US?
- In the US, prediction market gains are typically treated as ordinary income or short-term capital gains depending on holding period. Consult a tax professional for your specific situation — we cannot provide tax advice.
Trade Valorant: 100 Thieves vs MIBR LOS (BO3) - Esports Wo… on BTC Prediction
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →