LoL: KT Rolster Challengers vs BNK FearX Youth (BO3) - LCK Challengers League Rounds 1-2

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

KT Rolster Challengers were scheduled to play BNK FearX Youth in an LCK Challengers League best-of-three, and the market is already priced at a 100% yes outcome for KT. That is consistent with a result-driven contract where the winner is the only settled side unless the match is cancelled, tied, or pushed beyond the seven-day delay clause, in which case it flips to 50-50. For a heavily one-sided price, the main issue is less match quality than whether the fixture is actually completed and recognised by the league in the settlement window.

Comparable matches between these two sides show KT and BNK have met repeatedly in LCK CL play, including a 2025 playoff series that KT won 3-1, while BNK also took a 2-1 regular-season series earlier in 2026 according to match listings. That mixed recent head-to-head record suggests the live market price is not simply reflecting a long historical dominance, but rather the latest scheduling, roster, and form information being absorbed by traders. In prediction markets like this, a 100% line usually leaves more room for settlement-risk than sporting-risk.

The key catalyst is official confirmation that the Bo3 has been played and completed before the 11:00 UTC settlement deadline, with any postponement, technical issue, or schedule change the main event risk. LoL Esports’ schedule page has the fixture listed for Week 8, and third-party live score pages also show the match as placed on 22 May, but traders still watch for late edits from Riot, team channels, or the league broadcast. If there is no result posted in time, the contract’s delay and cancellation language becomes more important than the on-server scoreline.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reads LoL: KT Rolster Challengers vs BNK FearX Youth (BO3) - LCK Challengers League Rounds 1-2 on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed for comparison. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.