Counter-Strike: ex-Zero Tenacity vs SAW (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #3 Group C

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

ex-Zero Tenacity and SAW were due to meet in a best-of-three at the CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #3 Group C, a standard online CS2 qualifying fixture where the winner advances within the group bracket. The market sitting at 0% YES is strikingly disconnected from the event itself: when a match has a live scheduled slot and both teams are listed on the tournament board, a zero price usually reflects stale or misconfigured market data rather than a true view on the teams.

Comparable CCT Europe qualifier matches often move from a no-liquidity placeholder into a two-sided market only once line-ups, match pages and lobby status are confirmed. SAW usually carries the stronger pedigree, but ex-Zero Tenacity have shown they can take maps in European online series when vetoes favour them. In USDC-settled markets on Polymarket, the key issue is not the scoreline narrative but whether the match is actually played and completed before the settlement window closes; if a delay pushes it beyond seven days, the contract falls back to 50-50.

Traders should watch the tournament schedule, official match pages and any last-minute bracket reshuffles, as these qualifiers are vulnerable to walkovers, time changes and server delays. Sofascore and Liquipedia both listed the fixture for 22 May, suggesting it was planned for that day, but the actual resolution depends on whether a winner was recorded before 20:00 UTC. Broader crypto conditions matter only at the margin here, though sharp moves in BTC and ETH can affect overall Polymarket liquidity and USDC balances, which in turn influence how quickly a mispriced esports market corrects once activity returns.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reads Counter-Strike: ex-Zero Tenacity vs SAW (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #3 Group C on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed for comparison. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.