Counter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group A

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Legacy and TYLOO are due to meet in a best-of-three at the CS Asia Championships in Shanghai, with the market tied to which side wins the match rather than the map score. The current 100% YES reading suggests the contract has already been priced as effectively decided, which can happen when a market is deep in the money or when one outcome has become the only realistic settlement path. For a USDC-settled contract, the key point is whether the match is officially completed within the window; if not, the fallback rules can matter more than the pre-match favourite.

Comparable CS2 markets at this event have been driven by bracket position and timing as much as raw team strength. Legacy reached the upper-bracket final in Group A after beating BC.Game and M80, according to Field Level Media, while TYLOO arrived here after moving through the same group stage path. That matters because upper-bracket matches usually carry a straightforward progression: the winner advances immediately, and any disruption to schedule or format can affect resolution if the series is postponed or abandoned.

Traders should watch the official event schedule, any last-minute server or broadcast delays, and whether the series starts before the settlement window closes. Liquipedia and event coverage have already placed TYLOO as a long-running Chinese organisation with a strong domestic profile, while BO3.gg flagged TYLOO’s recent Mirage numbers against Legacy, which can influence live pricing if the maps are confirmed as expected. On-chain, the relevant watchpoint is whether USDC liquidity and any BTC or ETH move alter broader risk appetite, but the contract itself still resolves on the match outcome, not market direction.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reads Counter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group A on-chain. Polymarket's quote comes directly from the Polygon order book — the only comparable venue with on-chain settlement. Kalshi (USD, off-chain), Betfair (GBP/EUR, off-chain) and Manifold (play-money) are listed for comparison. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement is on-chain via UMA Optimistic Oracle. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, a two-hour dispute window opens, then the smart contract lifts winning conditional tokens to 1 USDC and sends payments to holders' wallets automatically. No withdrawal fees beyond Polygon gas.

Off-chain venues (Kalshi, Betfair, Smarkets) settle in local fiat through bank-side clearing — faster than SWIFT, slower than on-chain. Manifold pays no real cash.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.